A Quantitative Analysis Towards Interim-Reuse of Urban Voids: An Ecological Treatment Guideline with Regenerative Approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51596/sijocp.v3i2.48Keywords:
urban voids, interim reuse, climate change, regenerative design, ecological performanceAbstract
According to the United Nations declarations in 2019, cities, as humanity’s primary living habitat, will accommodate 68% of the world’s population by 2050. The more people settle in urban centres, the more severe the impacts are on ecosystems and the climate. Due to rapid urbanisation, the number of unused and under-managed urban spaces or “Urban voids” is rising. However, regenerative approaches can turn urban voids into assets to combat climate change and environmental issues. The regenerative design promotes ecological systems to regrow by allowing every urban component, like houses, workplaces, and neighbourhoods, to flourish ecologically. This research starts with reviewing related terms for urban voids beside a fundamental approach towards utilising them, “Interim re-use.” With these in hand, the research’s methodology mapped 577 urban voids in its “Balat and Fener” case study, two juxtaposing historical districts in Istanbul, Turkey. The study goes on to classify the mapped urban voids into six distinctive types. The classification of urban voids is done using a decision tree model with five features that are assigned binary values. The features are as follows: “Ownership,” “Debris,” “Economic activity,” “Seal,” and “Leisure facilities.” The next phase evaluates each parcel based on ecological criteria; each void is rated through a Likert scale in terms of “Vegetation,” “Permeability,” “Ruggedness,” and “Enclosure,” and thence, receives an ecological identity. After each parcel is classified and assigned its ecological identity, a two-phased treatment approach composed of twelve solutions is applied. Suppose the subject lacks the fundamental prerequisites, such as a permeable surface. In that case, proper land preparation solutions will be applied, and based on their ecological identity, they then receive the second phase’s applications. In conclusion, following the guidelines proposed in this paper, the decision-makers can treat urban voids to become more ecologically thriving and enhance their ecological performance.
References
Alberti, M. (2005). The Effects of Urban Patterns on Ecosystem Function. International Regional Science Review, 28(2), 168–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017605275160
AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2023 — IPCC. (n.d.). Retrieved April 21, 2023, from https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-cycle/
Bezmez, D. (2007). The Politics of Urban Regeneration: The Case of the Fener and Balat Initiative. New Perspectives on Turkey, 37, 59–86.
Blanco, E., Pedersen Zari, M., Raskin, K., & Clergeau, P. (2021). Urban Ecosystem-Level Biomimicry and Regenerative Design
Bosetti, N., & Colthorpe, T. (2018). Meanwhile, in London: Making use of London’s empty spaces. Centre for London.
Brown, M. (2016). FutuREstorative: Working towards a new sustainability. Riba Publishing.
Brown, M. M., Haselsteiner, E., Apró, D., Kopeva, D., Luca, E., Pulkkinen, K.-L., & Rizvanolli, B. (2018). Restorative to Regenerative: An exploration in progressing a paradigm shift in built environment thinking, from sustainability to restorative sustainability and on to regenerative sustainability.
Carmona, M. (2010). Contemporary Public Space: Critique and Classification, Part One: Critique. Journal of Urban Design, 15(1), 123–148.
Costa, P., Brito-Henriques, E., & Cavaco, C. (2021). Interim reuse in urban derelicts: Uncovering the community’s attitudes and preferences through scenario-elicitation. Cities, 111, 103103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103103
Craft, W., Ding, L., & Prasad, D. (2021). Developing a decision-making framework for regenerative precinct development. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(22). Scopus.
De Girolamo, F. (2013). Time and regeneration: Temporary reuse in lost spaces. Planum. The Journal of Urbanism, 2(27), 68–101.
Deneç, E. A. (2016). The Re-Production Of The Historical Center Of İstanbul In 2000s: A Critical Account On Two Projects In Fener - Balat. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 31(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.4305/metu.jfa.2014.2.9
Elbeah, B., Elshater, A., & Toama, A. (2022). Tactical Urbanism for Improving Livability in Lost Spaces of Cairo.
Goldstein, J., Jensen, M., & Reiskin, E. (2001). Urban vacant land redevelopment: Challenges and progress (Vol. 37). Citeseer.
Hashem, O. M., Wahba, S. M.-E., & Nasr-Eldin, T. I. (2022). Urban voids: Identifying and optimizing urban voids potential as a revitalization source in enhancing developing countries’ city income. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 69(1). Scopus.
Hwang, S. W., & Lee, S. J. (2020). Unused, underused, and misused: An examination of theories on urban void spaces. Urban Research & Practice, 13(5), 540–556.
Kadar, T., & Kadar, M. (2020). Sustainability Is Not Enough: Towards AI Supported Regenerative Design. Proceedings - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, ICE/ITMC 2020. Scopus.
Keyder, C. (2005). Globalization and Social Exclusion in Istanbul. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(1), 124–134.
Khalid, N. S., Hilal, S., Nasrudin, N., & Marzukhi, M. A. (2018). Lost Space in Urban Core Areas of Kuala Lumpur in Relations to Physical Urban Environment. Planning Malaysia Journal, 16(7). https://doi.org/10.21837/pmjournal.v16.i7.508
Kim, G. (2016). Assessing Urban Forest Structure, Ecosystem Services, and Economic Benefits on Vacant Land. Sustainability, 8(7), 679. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070679
Kim, G., Miller, P. A., & Nowak, D. J. (2015). Assessing urban vacant land ecosystem services: Urban vacant land as green infrastructure in the City of Roanoke, Virginia. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(3), 519–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.05.003
Liu, W., Feng, Q., Chen, W., & Deo, R. C. (2020). Stormwater runoff and pollution retention performances of permeable pavements and the effects of structural factors. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(24), 30831–30843.
López, J. I. M., Kim, G., Lei, Y., Newman, G., & Suppakittpaisarn, P. (2021). An assessment method and typology for the regeneration of vacant land in Quito, Ecuador. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 62, 127130.
Lopez-Pineiro, S. (2020). A Glossary of Urban Voids (Annotated edition). JOVIS.
Louekari, M. (2006). The creative potential of Berlin: Creating alternative models of social, economic and cultural organization in the form of network forming and open-source communities. Planning Practice and Research, 21(4), 463–481.
McKinney, M. L. (2008). Effects of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosystems, 11(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-007-0045-4
Mhatre, P. (2007). Vacant and abandoned lands: A theory paper. Plan.
Milnar, M., & Ramaswami, A. (2020). Impact of Urban Expansion and In Situ Greenery on Community-Wide Carbon Emissions: Method Development and Insights from 11 US Cities. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(24), 16086–16096.
Naboni, E., Havinga, L., & Accademia europea di Bolzano. (2019). Regenerative design in digital practice: A handbook for the built environment. published by Eurac Research.
Nassauer, J. I., & Raskin, J. (2014). Urban vacancy and land use legacies: A frontier for urban ecological research, design, and planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.10.008
Németh, J., & Langhorst, J. (2014). Rethinking urban transformation: Temporary uses for vacant land. Cities, 40, 143–150.
Pagano, M. A., & Bowman, A. O. (2000). Vacant land in cities: An urban resource. Brookings Institution, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy Washington, DC.
Pickett, S. T. A., Boone, C. G., McGrath, B. P., Cadenasso, M. L., Childers, D. L., Ogden, L. A., McHale, M., & Grove, J. M. (2013). Ecological science and transformation to the sustainable city. Cities, 32, S10–S20.
Reed, B. (2007). Shifting from ‘sustainability’ to regeneration. Building Research & Information, 35(6), 674–680.
Tao, C., Li, J., Zhou, D., Sun, J., Peng, D., & Lai, D. (2022). Outdoor Space Quality Mapping by Combining Accessibility, Openness, and Microclimate: A Case Study in a Neighborhood Park in Shanghai, China. Sustainability, 14(6), 3570.
Till, K. E. (2011). Interim Use at a Former Death Strip? Art, Politics, and Urbanism at Skulpturenpark Berlin_Zentrum. In M. Silberman (Ed.), The German Wall (pp. 99–122). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230118577_6
Trancik, R. (1986). Finding Lost Space: Theories of Urban Design. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, & Population Division. (2019). World urbanization prospects: The 2018 revision (Vol. 12).
Wahl, D. C. (2019). Sustainability is not enough: We need regenerative cultures. In Green Planet Blues (pp. 241–245). Routledge.
Walsh, C. J., Fletcher, T. D., & Burns, M. J. (2012). Urban Stormwater Runoff: A New Class of Environmental Flow Problem. PLoS ONE, 7(9), e45814.
Wimberly, M. C., Davis, J. K., Evans, M. V., Hess, A., Newberry, P. M., Solano-Asamoah, N., & Murdock, C. C. (2020). Land cover affects microclimate and temperature suitability for arbovirus transmission in an urban landscape.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mojtaba Samadi, Meltem Erdem Kaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
