Challenges and Research Trends for Drawing Ability in Design Education: A Literature Review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51596/sijocp.v4i1.43

Keywords:

drawing, drawing ability, drawing decline, design education, drawing research

Abstract

“I can’t draw” are three simple words, yet they formulate a statement that might conceal students’ feelings of drawing inability and powerlessness. These words also represent the major concern perceived among lecturers in design, that many students lack the necessary drawing abilities to transform ideas into representations. Discussions about this problem occur where drawing is the main language of communicating ideas, particularly in the classroom where the problem reveals its (harsh) reality. What are the roots of the design students’ lack of drawing abilities?

In an attempt to formulate an answer to this research question, this paper presents a literature review within the lens of contemporary design production and education. Based on a systematic literature search of conceptual works and empirical studies, this paper employed a narrative approach to discuss the results, with particular attention to design praxis and design education. The main findings revealed that the problem of drawing ability has its roots in a) the use of the computer and loss of design thinking process, as well as the decline of hand-drawing practice; b) reduced drawing tuition and change of the meaning of drawing in higher education. All these factors tend to contribute, explicitly or implicitly, to the lack of drawing ability of design students. The aim of this paper is to invite educators to a critical reflection on drawing ability and its practices in design education and to provide an opportunity where drawing debates are not only encouraged but a necessary part of the learning-teaching paradigm.

Author Biography

Melissa Di Giovanni, Programme Leader and Lecturer, Interior Design, University of Derby, United Kingdom

Melissa Di Giovanni is a Lecturer in Design and the Programme Leader for Interior Design at the University of Derby. She is also a PhD student in Architecture at the University of Derby. Her current research investigates how cognitive and psychological factors influence drawing ability and affect the educational experience of design students. Her research interests include developing pedagogical strategies to respond to the educational and motivational needs of students. She holds an MSc in Architecture with a specialisation in Architectural Drawing from Gabriele d’Annunzio University, Italy. Before moving to England, she worked at Gabriele d’Annunzio University (Italy) and at ABU - Antalya Bilim University (Turkey), where she taught the Science of Representation, Architecture and Interior Design, and Graphic Communication. She is also a Member and Didact coordinator of the non-profit Italian organisation MusAA - Museo Architettura Arte.

References

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing Narrative Literature Reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1(3), 311-320. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311

Belardi, P. (2014). Why Architects Still Draw (Z. Nowak, Trans.). The MIT Press. https://direct.mit.edu/books/book/2201/Why-Architects-Still-Draw

Benjamin, A. (2014). The preliminary: notes on the force of drawing. The Journal of Architecture, 19(4), 470-482. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2014.953191

Berger, J. (2005). Berger on drawing. Occasional Press.

Brown, P. (2009). CAD: Do Computers Aid the Design Process After All? Intersect: The Stanford Journal of Science, Technology, and Society, 2(1). https://ojs.stanford.edu/ojs/index.php/intersect/article/view/117

Cappa, F. (Ed.). (2016). Eredità dei saperi: Tradizioni e transizioni culturali [Knowledge legacy: Cultural traditions and transitions]. edizioni libraria Cortina Milano.

Casey, S. (2016). A Delicate Presence: the Queer Intimacy of Drawing. TRACEY: What is Drawing For(2016), 1-9. https://www.lboro.ac.uk/microsites/sota/tracey/journal/pre/2016/PDF/sarah-casey-presence-contribution.pdf

Christenson, M. (2007). Ownership and media: The architectural case study as an articulation of theoretical stance. Design Communication Association 20th Anniversary Conference, Muncie, Indiana. https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/dca-20th-anniversary-conference-michel-a-mounayar/1113675858?ean=9781257358441

Contessi, G. (2019). Per una nuova inattualità [For a new un-contemporariness]. XY, 1(1), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.15168/xy.v1i1.13

de Rubertis, R. (2018). Towards which Representation? diségno, 1(2), pp. 23-32. https://doi.org/10.26375/disegno.2.2018.5

Dewey, J. (1980). Having an experience. In Art as experience. First Perigee Printing. (Reprinted from 23)

Di Napoli, G. (2004). Disegnare e conoscere: La mano, l’occhio, il segno [Drawing and knowing: The hand, the eye, the sign]. Piccola Biblioteca Einaudi. https://www.einaudi.it/catalogo-libri/arte-e-musica/arte/disegnare-e-conoscere-giuseppe-di-napoli-9788806167523/

Di Napoli, G. (2011). Che cos’è un disegno e perché si disegna [What drawing is and why we draw]. Rivista di estetica(47), 61-81. https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.1955

Fava, M. (2020). A Decline in Drawing Ability? International Journal of Art & Design Education, 39(2), 319-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12255

Graves, M. (2005). The Necessity for Drawing. In B. M. Ambroziak (Ed.), Michael Graves: Images of a Grand Tour (pp. 235-245). Princeton Archit.Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-56898-657-2_9

Gregotti, V. (2014). Il Disegno come strumento di progetto [Drawing as instrument of the design]. Christian Marinotti Edizioni s.r.l.

Kantrowitz, A., Brew, A., & Fava, M. (2011). Thinking through drawing: Practice into knowledge. Symposium on Drawing, Cognition and Education, New York.

Laseau, P. (2001). Graphic Thinking for Architects & Designers (3rd ed.). Wiley.

Lawson, B. (2005). How Designers Think (4 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.4324/9780080454979

Lawson, B. (2019). The Design Student’s Journey: Understanding How Designers Think. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/The-Design-Students-Journey-understanding-How-Designers-Think/Lawson/p/book/9781138328570

Leinss, M. (2009). Making meaning of technology – through Design. Second International Conference on Critical Digital: Who Cares (?), Cambridge, USA.

Levy, Y., & Ellis, T. J. (2006). A Systems Approach to Conduct an Effective Literature Review in Support of Information Systems Research. Informing Science Journal, 9. https://doi.org/10.28945/479

Mark, E. (2000). A Prospectus on Computers Throughout the Design Curriculum. 18th eCAADe Education and research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe, Weimar, Germany.

Maynard, P. (2005). Drawing Distinctions: The Varieties of Graphic Expression. Cornell University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctv2n7fsz

Migliari, R. (2004). Preface. In R. Migliari (Ed.), Disegno come Modello: Riflessioni del disegno nell’era dell’informatica [Drawing as Model: Reflections on drawing in the digital age]. Kappa.

Nancy, J.-L., & Armstrong, P. (2013). The Pleasure in Drawing. Fordham University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt13x02tz

Nejadriahi, H., & Arab, K. (2017). A Study on the Impacts of Computer Aided Design on the Architectural Design Process. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 11, 1049-1053. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/144729804.pdf

Neuckermans, H. (2017). Architectural design in the era of technology. TECHNE - Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment(13), 33-37. https://doi.org/10.13128/Techne-21130

Oinas-Kukkonen, H., & Harjumaa, M. (2008). A Systematic Framework for Designing and Evaluating Persuasive Systems. Persuasive Technology, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Paré, G., Trudel, M.-C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information & Management, 52(2), 183-199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008

Purini, F. (2017). Elementary Observations on Drawing. diségno(1), 059-072. https://doi.org/10.26375/disegno.1.2017.8

Purini, F. (2020). Random and provisional notes on drawing. diségno(6), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.26375/disegno.6.2020.05

RIBA. (2014). RIBA Appointments: Skills Survey Report 2014. https://cdn.rt.emap.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2015/02/17203356/skills_report_2014.pdf

Scheer, D. (2014). The Death of Drawing: Architecture in the Age of Simulation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315813950

Sennet, R. (2009). The Craftsman. Yale University Press.

Soliman, S., Taha, D., & El Sayad, Z. (2019). Architectural education in the digital age: Computer applications: Between academia and practice. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58(2), 809-818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.05.016

Turkle, S. (2022). Simulation and Its Discontents. In Simulation and Its Discontents (pp. 3-101). The MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262546799/simulation-and-its-discontents/

Vasari, G. (1912). Lives of the Most Eminent Painters Sculptors and Architects (G. D. C. De Vere, Trans.; Vol. 1). Macmillan snd Co. Ld. & The Medici Society. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/25326/25326-h/25326-h.htm

Downloads

Published

2024-07-31

How to Cite

Di Giovanni, M. (2024). Challenges and Research Trends for Drawing Ability in Design Education: A Literature Review. SPACE International Journal of Conference Proceedings , 4(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.51596/sijocp.v4i1.43