Quality of Apartment Layouts in Contemporary Urban Housing: The Study of Riga

Authors

  • Santa Freimane M.Sc., Riga Technical University, Faculty of Architecture, Latvia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51596/sijocp.v2i1.36

Keywords:

human needs, contemporary housing, apartment layouts, residential environment, housing sustainability

Abstract

Housing is not only shelter as well as a fundamental human right but also a setting which plays a vital role in daily life. In light of the housing issues in many urban settlements, it is important to consider human needs in efforts to solve housing problems. Unmet human needs may cause significant conflicts and pathologies for individuals and society. In turn, human-oriented design elevates the quality of housing and contributes to overall sustainability. Each year in Riga and its agglomeration, new residential projects appear. Little is known about how these projects respond to human needs and contribute to the overall goal of sustainability. This study aims to outline human needs theories in the context of housing design and to evaluate whether contemporary apartment layouts succeed or fail at fulfilling those needs. The investigation of human needs theories has been based on a relevant literature review. The exploration of housing evaluation systems in the United Kingdom and Switzerland has been used to link human need theories with measurable indicators regarding housing layouts. Afterwards, 12 indicators have been determined and used to assess case studies. The significant findings indicate that there are two main approaches to apartment layouts. In the case of the compact-budget approach, weaknesses, such as single-aspect orientation or small room dimensions, have been identified. In the case of the generous-luxurious approach, the much larger apartments and total floor areas allow for better layout options with added value in many instances. This paper also reviewed an extra case study, the Prototype project suggested by the Ministry of Economics of the Republic of Latvia, which appeared to demonstrate a mediocre performance in terms of human-centred design. 

References

Beamish, J.O, Carucci Goss, R. and Emmel J.A. (2001). Lifestyle Influences on Housing Preferences. Housing and Society, 28(1–2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/08882746.2001.11430459

Bin Mohd Jusan, M., Bashri Bin Sulaiman, A. (2005). Personalisation as a Sustainable Approach to Mass Housing: the Fundamental Theory. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11795821.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiT_JLan_vxAhWyhP0HHbf4BeYQFjABegQIBRAC&usg=AOvVaw2_pVCwYmPAMusJpKMsOmS-

Branco Pedro, J. (2017). How small can a house be? In L. Bragança et al. (Eds.), Portugal SB10: sustainable building affordable to all: low-cost sustainable solutions. Multicomp. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321485432_How_small_can_a_house_be

City of Melbourne. (2013). Understanding the Quality of Housing Design. Retrieved from http://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/ehq-production-australia/dea058382f9d2a76887de018c170038f0d1f6b41/documents/attachments

/000/000/014/original/Understanding_the_Quality_of_Housing_Design_Final_February2013.pdf?1370575687

Estaji, H. (2014). Flexible Spatial Configuration in Traditional Houses, The Case of Sabzevar. International Journal of Contemporary Architecture “The New ARCH”, 1(1), 26–35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263350623_Flexible_Spatial_Configuration_in_Traditional_Houses_the_Case_of_Sabzevar

Jacobsen, J. B. (n.d.) The Needs of Living. [Unpublished thesis]. Department of Product Design, Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Retrieved from https://www.ntnu.no/documents/10401/1264433962/JonasArtikkel.pdf/cc59b2ab-4005-45fa-b59b-c32d500f35da

Kragulj, F. (2014). Creating Knowledge of Need: A Methodological Framework for its Abductive Inference. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276920481_Creating_Knowledge_of_Need_A_

Methodological_Framework_for_its_Abductive_Inference

Mahdavinejad, M., Mashayekhi, M., & Ghaedi, A. (2012). Designing communal spaces in residential complexes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51(2012), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.169

Manum, B. (2006). Apartment layouts and domestic life: the interior space and its usability: a study of Norwegian apartments built from 1930–2005. Retrieved from https://aho.brage.unit.no/aho-xmlui/handle/11250/2487862

Marker, S. (2003). Unmet Human Needs. Retrieved from https://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/human_needs cited

Max-Neef, M. A. (1991). Human Scale Development: Conception, Application and Further Reflections. The Apex Press. Retrieved from http://www.wtf.tw/ref/max-neef.pdf

RIBA. (2011). The Case for Space: The Size of England’s New Homes. Retrieved from https://kb.goodhomes.org.uk/report/the-case-for-space-the-size-of-englands-new-homes/

Seelig, T., Milligan, V. Phibbs, P. and Thompson, A. (2008). Reconceptualising housing need in the context of 21st century Australian housing policy (AHURI Positioning Paper No.110). Retrieved from https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2008-10/apo-nid4998.pdf

Sima, L. (2018). A Study on Small Apartment Design in China: Evaluation on the Impressions of and Preferences for the Floor Plans. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.14.307

The National Affordable Homes Agency. (2008). 721 Housing Quality Indicators (HQI) Form. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/366634/721_hqi_form_4_apr_08_update_20080820153028.pdf

University College London. (2010). Housing standards: evidence and research. A report prepared by University College London for CABE in April 2010. Research conducted by Prof Matthew Carmona, Prof Nick Gallent Reetuparna Sarkar Space standards: the benefits. Retrieved from https://files.cambridge.gov.uk/public/ldf/coredocs/rd-h-200.pdf

Yavari, F., Vale, B., and Khajehzadeh, I. (2015). Guidelines for personalization opportunities in apartment housing. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293817212_Guidelines_for_personalization_opportunities_in_apartment_housing

Web References

https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights (Last Access: 14.10.2021)

https://www.simplypsychology.org/maslow.html (Last Access: 14.10.2021)

https://www.wbs.admin.ch/de (Last Access: 14.10.2021)

https://likumi.lv/ta/id/275016-noteikumi-par-latvijas-buvnormativu-lbn-211-15-dzivojamas-ekas- (Last Access: 14.10.2021)

https://www.rdpad.lv/rtp/tematiskie-planojumi-2/apstiprinatie/ (Last Access: 14.10.2021)

https://www.magdelena.lv/en/ (Last Access: 10.09.2021)

https://www.bonava.lv/dzivokli/riga/krasta-rajons/krasta-kvartals (Last Access: 10.09.2021)

https://bis.gov.lv/noderigi/tipveida-projekts (Last Access: 10.09.2021)

https://skanste.lv/lv/dzivokli2/ (Last Access: 10.09.2021)

http://trebuhome.lv/en/ (Last Access: 10.09.2021)

https://lindenholma.lv/en (Last Access: 10.09.2021)

https://www.akacijas.lv/ (Last Access: 10.09.2021)

Downloads

Published

2022-07-25

How to Cite

Freimane, S. (2022). Quality of Apartment Layouts in Contemporary Urban Housing: The Study of Riga. SPACE International Journal of Conference Proceedings , 2(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.51596/sijocp.v2i1.36