ISSN: 2977-814X  
Volume 2 Issue 2  
Sustainable, Nearly Zero-Emission  
Refurbishment for Residential- Historical  
Buildings  
Rania Obead1, Arch.MSc, Edinburgh School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture,  
United Kingdom  
@2022 Rania Obead  
Published by SPACE Studies Publications owned by SPACE Studies of Planning and Architecture Ltd.  
To cite this article:  
Obead, R. (2022). Sustainable, Nearly Zero-Emission Refurbishment for Residential- Historical Buildings.  
SPACE International Journal of Conference Proceedings , 2(2), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.51596/sijocp.v2i2.86  
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative  
Commons Attribution(CC BY) license  
SPACE Studies Publications  
ISSN: 2977-814X  
Volume 2 Issue 2  
Sustainable, Nearly Zero-Emission  
Refurbishment for Residential- Historical  
Buildings  
Rania Obead1, Arch.MSc, Edinburgh School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, United  
Kingdom  
Article History:  
Received June 15, 2022  
Accepted September 20, 2022  
Published Online December 27, 2022  
Abstract  
Tocombattheharmfuleffectsofclimatechange,manystepsmustbetakentoreducegreenhouse  
gas emissions. Reducing carbon emissions in the construction sector for both new and existing  
buildings plays a major role in achieving a zero-emissions economy. Reaching zero emissions  
in existing buildings requires upgrading the building envelope, implementing efficient systems,  
and using renewable energy to meet the remaining energy needs. This research proposes a  
sustainable approach to converting an existing residential building into a nearly zero-emission  
house. In this study, various sustainable scenarios were considered to upgrade an existing house  
to a nearly zero-emission building. The case study is a house built in 1794, and to reach nearly  
zero emissions, the following steps were applied. First, sustainable strategies for rehabilitating the  
house were suggested. Secondly, Integrated Environmental Solutions and virtual environment  
softwarewereusedtocalculatethecasestudyenergyandemissionsbaseline. Thirdly, sustainable  
materials to upgrade the envelope were considered, as well as the identification of alternatives to  
upgrade the house services. After this, software was used to calculate the effect of each material  
on energy and emissions reductions in comparison to the baseline. Fourthly, the payback period  
for each material was calculated by using the total construction costs divided by the revenue  
from energy savings. Fifthly, alternatives were selected with reasonable payback periods for  
the refurbishment process. Finally, renewables were added to cover some of the remaining  
energy needs. After applying the refurbishment steps, the house’s energy consumption and  
emissions are reduced significantly. The total cost of the proposed renovation is £24,976.90, with  
a repayment period ranging from 1.1 to 11.5 years. Energy consumption and carbon emissions  
are significantly reduced by adding renewables when compared to improving the envelope  
and services. Compared to the baseline, the refurbishment achieves a considerable reduction in  
energy consumption and emissions by 65.3% % and 62.4%, respectively.  
Keywords: sustainable refurbishment, historical buildings, residential buildings, zero-emissions buildings  
1. Introduction  
Many steps are needed to reduce greenhouse gases (GHG) and eliminate the harmful effects  
of climate change. The efforts towards a zero-emissions economy should start now, or the cost  
Corresponding Author: Rania Obead, Arch.MSc, Edinburgh School of Architecture and  
Landscape Architecture, United Kingdom. s1700714@ed.ac.uk  
30  
SPACE Studies Publications  
and time needed in future to make any development in this field will be high (Adedeji & Reuben  
& Olatoye, 2014). Buildings consume about 40% of the world’s energy and produce more than a  
third of global carbon emissions (Medved, Domjan, & Arkar, 2019). Reducing carbon emissions  
and achieving zero emissions in the construction sector are major parts of the road towards  
a zero-emissions economy. To achieve this target, many new concepts in the building sector  
are becoming more commonplace, such as zero-emission and nearly zero-emission buildings.  
Zero-emissions buildings reduce their operational energy by upgrading the building envelope,  
using efficient systems, and using renewables to cover the remaining required energy. The target  
of achieving zero-emission buildings is achievable but challenging (Zabaneh, 2011). In a similar  
definition, Ahmed et al. (2022) state that net-zero-emissions buildings are buildings that have  
high operation energy efficiency, and this can be achieved by using a highly insulated envelope,  
highly efficient heating and/or cooling systems, and low operation energy to operate the building  
equipment as well as using passive techniques, then using renewables to cover the remaining  
energy needed.  
The EU has accomplished a remarkable reduction in carbon emissions in recent decades. In  
2018, the Union’s carbon emissions had decreased by 23% compared to the 1990s emissions.  
The EU targets achieving 40% by 2030 and becoming a zero-emissions economy by 2050  
(Herold et al., 2019). The EU has published numerous directives across sectors to achieve this  
target. In the building sector, the European Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD)  
was adopted in 2010. The EPBD introduces the term nearly zero-emissions buildings (NZEB),  
stating that all new builds should be NZEB by 2020 (Medved & Domjan, & Arkar, 2019). The UK  
sets an ambitious target to reach zero emissions by 2050. In the UK, buildings account for 26%  
of the country’s total GHG emissions, and homes are the major contributor, accounting for 77%  
of the total buildings sector direct emissions. Only 15% of the UK residential building stock was  
built after 1990. Therefore, the majority of this stock was built to meet low energy-efficiency  
requirements. According to this, most UK homes need to be upgraded to improve their energy  
efficiency (The House of Commons, 2019).  
Specific steps are required to achieve NZEB in existing buildings: upgrade the building  
envelope, install highly efficient equipment, and add renewable energy. Reaching NZEB in a new  
building is a complicated process, but it is more complex in existing buildings (Torgal, 2013).  
Many of the aspects applied in the new build to achieve NZEB could not be applied to existing  
buildings because of their existing features, such as site, orientation, and building massing. All  
these challenges complicate and problematize the target of achieving NZEB in existing buildings  
(Menassa & Ortiz-Vega, 2013). One of the main challenges in refurbishing existing buildings to  
achieve NZEB status is the high initial cost and long payback periods (Asadi et al., 2013). The  
only way to justify the high cost of the energy-efficiency refurbishment is a reasonable payback  
period (Menassa & Ortiz-Vega, 2013).  
To reduce the overall environmental impact of the refurbishment, the three sustainability  
pillars (environmental, social, and economic) should be considered. Sustainable refurbishment  
can generate many benefits, such as reducing energy consumption/emissions, waste, and  
water consumption, as well as improving the indoor environment. Moreover, using sustainable  
materials during refurbishment is important for reducing the embodied energy of the process  
(Chan, 2014). Construction materials should have a low environmental impact to improve the  
environmental performance of the construction process. One of the tools used to measure the  
product’s environmental performance is the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), which measures the  
product’s environmental impacts throughout the whole life of the product, starting from the  
extraction of the raw materials to the production process, and then the use of the product and  
ending with the product’s end of life (Passer et al., 2015). The Environmental Product Declaration  
(EPD) system provides LCA data for different products, prepared by manufacturers and verified  
by a third party (BRE Global, 2020).  
This research suggests a process for refurbishing an existing house. It proposes different  
sustainable alternatives and scenarios that will achieve nearly zero-emission criteria. These  
scenarios will be evaluated by calculating the best payback periods.  
journal.spacestudies.co.uk  
31  
2. Methodology  
This study proposes various sustainable scenarios for upgrading an existing house to achieve  
NZEB status. A single house built in 1794 was selected as a case study, and then the following  
steps were applied. Firstly, a sustainable approach to refurbishing the house was suggested  
by reducing energy consumption and emissions, using sustainable materials, and limiting the  
required work to reduce costs and waste while preserving the main building’s architectural  
features. Secondly, Integrated Environmental Solutions-Virtual Environment (IESVE) software was  
used to calculate the energy and emissions baseline. Thirdly, sustainable materials with an EPD  
certificate were suggested to upgrade the envelope and provide alternatives for upgrading the  
house services, where the software was also used to calculate each material’s effect on energy  
and emissions. Fourthly, the payback period for each material was calculated by dividing the total  
construction costs by the energy-saving costs. Fifthly, the materials that have the lowest payback  
period were selected. Finally, renewables were added to cover some of the remaining required  
energy and to measure their effectiveness in reducing emissions.  
3. The Case Study  
This study proposes a sustainable refurbishment method to reduce energy demand in existing  
domestic buildings. As part of this study, an existing house is used to evaluate the different  
suggested refurbishment scenarios. The case study is a single house built in 1794, sited on the  
Peffermill Playing Fields in Edinburgh, Scotland.  
Figure 1. The case study  
Table 1. Case study construction elements  
House element  
External walls  
Roof  
Materials  
U value  
mass masonry construction  
timber frame  
0.94 W/m2K  
1.6 W/m2K  
1.04 W/m2K  
2.5 W/m2K  
2.6 W/m2K  
0.980 W/m2K  
-
Floor  
exposed timber floorboards  
timber casement windows  
timber panelled  
Windows  
Doors  
Ceiling  
lath and plaster  
Space heating  
gas combined boiler  
4. Refurbishment Steps  
The suggested approach to refurbishing the house is a sustainable one by considering the  
following:  
• Reducing the house energy consumption and emissions.  
• Using sustainable materials that have low environmental impacts according to their EPD  
certificate.  
• Reducing the amount of required work to reduce the cost and waste.  
32  
SPACE Studies Publications  
• Save the main building architecture features by adding the materials to the inner side of  
the walls and roof.  
The two main steps for the refurbishment are improving the building envelope and services and  
then integrating renewables.  
4.1. Calculations of the Case Study Baseline  
The first step is modelling the case study using IESVE to find a baseline, similar to the house  
performance, by entering the data of the case study, such as the construction elements’ U  
values, lighting (fluorescent lamps used at 0.8 W), internal gain (in this case, four people), the  
refrigerator (150W), and the cooker (1500W). The calculated baseline for the case study is a total  
yearly energy consumption of 62 MWh and total carbon dioxide emissions of 25,094 kgCO2.  
4.2. Upgrading the House Envelope  
EPD certifications require production-stage emissions as a mandatory requirement, which consist  
of emissions from raw material extraction, transport to the manufacturer, and the manufacturing  
process. These stages are known as A1-A3. Therefore, in this study, the suggested EPD-certified  
materials are those with lower environmental impacts across the mandatory criteria A1-A3.  
The methodology here is to search the EPD website for certified products and then exclude  
those produced within the EU to avoid long-distance transport. Then, the findings are compared  
according to the environmental impacts listed in the certificate, as measured by Global Warming  
Potential (GWP) in kg CO2 eq.  
When applying the search methodology to suggest products to upgrade the house envelope  
with products that have an EPD certificate and have originated within the EU, the findings are:  
• 25 window types match the searching criteria, and 9 are suitable to be used for the case  
study. When comparing the GWP, the lowest environmental impact is Elitfönster AB - IKI-  
AL windows, EPD number S-P-03418, with GWP 15.8 kgCo2eq.  
• 18 door types match the searching criteria, and 4 are suitable to be used for the case  
study. When comparing the GWP, the lowest environmental impact is the wooden door  
from Daloc, EPD number S-P-01392, with GWP 49 kgCo2eq.  
• 110 insulation materials for walls and roofs match the search criteria, and 50 are suitable to  
be used for the case study. When comparing the GWP, the lowest environmental impact  
is Glass Mineral Wool Rolls from Knauf Insulation, EPD number S-P-04975, with GWP 0.722  
kgCo2eq.  
• The suggested flooring insulation is carpet to avoid extra construction work for removing  
and replacing, which can add more cost and waste. Two carpet types match the search  
criteria, and both are suitable to be used for the case study. When comparing the GWP,  
the lowest environmental impact is carpet flooring Desso Ecobase from Tarkett, France,  
with EPD number S-P-01356 and GWP 5.03 kgCo2eq.  
After this, a simulation using the IESVE program was run to measure each material’s effect on  
the house’s energy consumption and carbon emissions. Then, this impact on the baseline was  
compared to determine the material effect on energy consumption and emissions.  
The next step is to calculate the payback period using the following steps. First, the energy  
revenue per year is calculated by multiplying the yearly energy saving by the natural gas UK grid  
cost (which is 4.25p - Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, 2022) - improving  
the envelope thermal performance will mainly result in reducing the energy used for space  
heating, and the heating system in this house uses a traditional boiler with gas as fuel. Secondly,  
the cost is calculated by adding these materials, including the material and construction costs.  
Spon’s Architects’ and Builders’ Price Book 2022 prices are used for this. Thirdly, the total cost is  
calculated by multiplying the total area of each material by the element cost. Finally, the payback  
period is calculated by dividing the total cost by the revenue from the energy saving.  
journal.spacestudies.co.uk  
33  
Table 2. The suggested material to upgrade the house envelope.  
Product  
name  
GWP A1-A3 U value Energy saving –  
Energy  
revenue  
yearly  
Total cost  
Payback  
period per  
year  
KgCo2eq  
W/m2K carbon emissions  
reduction  
Window Elit- 15.8  
fönster AB  
IKI-AL  
1.12  
62.3-61.6=0.7 MWh 700 x 4.25  
25093.9– 24931.5= =£29.75  
162.4 kgCO2  
The number of  
windows is 13 the  
window cost is  
466.51  
6064.6/29.75=  
203.8 years  
13x466.5=£6064.6  
Door:  
49  
1.2  
62.3-62.2=0.1 MWh 100 x 4.25  
25093.9–25065.8= =£4.25  
28.1 kgCO2  
The number of  
doors is 2 the door  
cost is 485.03  
970.06/4.25=  
228.3 years  
Wooden  
door from  
Daloc  
2x285.03=£970.06  
Wall insula-  
tion  
0,722  
0.037  
0.037  
0.084  
62.3-57.9=4.4 MWh 4400 x 4.25 The total exter-  
2145.5/187=  
11.5 years  
25093.9 –24147.4=  
946.5 kgCO2  
=£187  
nal wall area is  
303.9m2  
303.9x7.06=£2145.5  
Roof insula- 0,722  
tion  
62.3-57.7=4.6 MWh 4600 x 4.25 The total roof area  
765.4/195.5=  
3.9 years  
25093.9  
–24105.3=988.6  
kgCO2  
=£195.5  
is 126.3m2  
126.3x6.06=£765.4  
Floor insula- 5.03  
tion  
62.3-61.9=0.4MWh  
25093.9 – 25017.6= =£17  
400 x 4.25  
The total floor area  
is 98.9m2  
2027.45/17=  
119.3 year  
76.3 kgCO2  
98.9x20.5=£2027.45  
4.3. Upgrading the House Services  
The suggested upgrade for the house services is to change the boiler and lights. Replace the  
gas boiler with a combined heat and power (CHP) boiler and replace the fluorescent lights with  
LED ones.  
The boiler currently in use is 70% efficient, and the suggested CHP unit is 95% efficient. The  
IESVE software was used to calculate energy savings and carbon emissions reductions for the  
proposed boiler compared with the baseline. The average cost of replacing the boiler is £5000.  
CHP boilers produce both heat and electricity; therefore, to calculate the energy revenue per year,  
one can use a 1:1.6 ratio for heat and electricity produced by the CHP (Heat Network Partnership  
for Scotland, 2017), then multiply it by the yearly energy cost, which is 4.25p for natural gas  
and 20.84p for electricity (Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, 2022). Then,  
calculate the payback period by dividing the total cost by the revenue.  
Changing the fluorescent lights to highly efficient LED lights will reduce energy consumption  
as the current lights consume 80W, while the LED ones use 10W. The simulation was used to  
calculate energy savings and carbon dioxide emissions reductions for the LED lights compared  
with the baseline. The energy revenue was calculated by multiplying the energy saved by the  
grid electricity costs (20.84p). Then, the payback period was calculated by dividing the total cost  
by the revenue.  
Table 3. The suggested services  
The  
services  
Energy saving –  
Energy-saving  
Energy revenue  
yearly  
Boiler  
cost  
Payback period  
carbon emissions yearly  
reduction  
CHP  
62.3-59.6 =2.7MWh 2.7MWh  
25093.9–23939.3= 2700 KWh  
1154.6 KgCO2  
1038.5x4.25=£44.1  
1661.5x20.84=£346.3  
Total £390.4  
£5000  
5000/390.4=  
12.8 Years  
LED lights  
62.3-62 =0.3MWh  
25093.9–24821=  
272.9 KgCO2  
0.3 MWh  
300 kWh  
300 x 20.84=£62.5  
3 x 22=£66 66/62.5=  
1.1 years  
34  
SPACE Studies Publications  
4.4. Integrating Renewables  
The suggested renewables for the case study are solar PV and Air Source Heat Pumps (ASHP).  
By adding 20 solar panels to the property’s roof (south-facing), the simulation shows the panels  
will produce 13.5 MWh and reduce emissions by 7026.6 kgCO2 each year. Solar panels produce  
both heating and electricity; therefore, to calculate the energy revenue per year, one can use  
the 1:2 ratio for the heat and electricity produced by the panels, then multiply the yearly energy  
reduction by the natural gas UK grid cost (4.25p) and the electricity UK grid costs (20.84p)  
(Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, 2022). The solar panels are eligible for  
the Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) for the energy used for hot water, which pays 21.36p per kWh  
produced by the panels (Home heating guide, 2019). After that, calculate the payback period by  
dividing the total cost by the energy revenue.  
The second choice for renewables is using an ASHP. The heat pumps are eligible for the RHI,  
which accounts for 10.71p for any kWh produced by the ASHP (Home heating guide, 2019).  
The software was used to calculate the ASHP’s energy savings and their effects on energy  
consumption and carbon emissions. Then, the energy revenue was calculated by multiplying the  
energy saved by the gas cost (4.25p). After that, the payback period was calculated by dividing  
the ASHP’s total cost by its energy revenue.  
Table 4. Suggests renewables  
The  
services  
Energy saving –  
carbon emissions  
reduction  
Energy-saving  
yearly  
Energy revenue  
yearly  
Total  
cost  
Payback period  
Solar panels 62.3-46.8 =13.5MWh  
25093.9–  
13.5MWh  
13500 KWh  
9000 x 20.84=£1875.6  
4500 x 4.25=£191.3  
RHI4500x21.36=£961.2  
Total £3028.1  
£7000  
7000/3028.1=  
2.3 Years  
18067.3=7026.6 KgCO2  
ASHP  
36.4- 21=15.4MWh  
16191.4-10910= 5280.9  
KgCO2  
15.4MWh  
15400 KWH  
15400 x 4.25=£654.5  
RHI yearly  
15400 x 10.71 =£1649.3  
Total 2303.84  
£10000  
10000/2303.8  
=4.3 years  
Table 2 shows the payback periods for upgrading the house windows, doors, and floor are  
203.8 years, 228.3 years and 119.3 years, respectively. These periods are longer than the house’s  
expected life, which is usually 60 years; therefore, upgrading the house windows, doors and floor  
is excluded from the suggested refurbishment due to the long payback period. The payback  
periods for adding walls and roof insulation are 6.6 years and 2.6 years, respectively. These  
payback periods are reasonable; therefore, adding insulation to the roof and walls should be  
considered for the house refurbishment.  
Table 3 shows the payback periods for upgrading the house boiler and lights: 12.8 years and  
1.1 years, respectively. These payback periods are reasonable; therefore, upgrading the house’s  
boiler and lights should be considered as part of the refurbishment.  
Table 5. The selected materials for the house refurbishment  
Selected materials  
Total cost  
Payback period per Energy-saving per  
Emissions saving  
per KgCO2  
year  
11.5  
3.9  
12.8  
1.1  
KW/h  
4400  
4600  
2700  
Wall insulation  
Roof insulation  
Boiler  
2145.5  
765.4  
5000  
66  
946.5  
988.6  
1154.6  
272.9  
LED lighting  
Solar panels  
ASHP  
300  
7000  
10000  
24976.9  
2.3  
4.3  
13500  
15400  
40900  
7026.6  
5280.9  
15670.1  
Total  
journal.spacestudies.co.uk  
35  
Table 4 shows the payback periods for adding solar panels and ASHP, which are 2.3 and 4.3  
years, respectively. These payback periods are reasonable; therefore, adding solar panels and  
ASHP should be considered for the house refurbishment.  
Figure 2. Comparison of refurbishment of selected materials and renewables  
5. Discussion  
For the suggested house envelope upgrades, the lowest payback period is for roof insulation,  
at 3.9 years, because most of the building’s heat escapes through the roof, and the cost of  
roof insulation is reasonable. All these make adding roof insulation the best investment for the  
existing house’s refurbishment. The lowest-cost investment is replacing the lights with highly  
efficient ones, which costs £66 in the case study. The advantage of this upgrade is that it requires  
no construction work or additional labour costs. Adding external wall insulation and replacing  
the boiler with a highly efficient one have reasonable payback periods and could be suitable  
investments for the house’s owners.  
Figure 3. Comparison of energy consumption and carbon emissions pre- and post-refurbishment  
When comparing the energy consumption and carbon emissions reduction of the refurbishment  
with the baseline, which totals a yearly energy consumption of 62.3 MWh and total carbon dioxide  
emissions of 25,093.9 kgCO2, the envelope and services upgrades reduce energy consumption  
36  
SPACE Studies Publications  
to 50.3 MWh yearly, and emissions to 21,731.3 kgCO2. Therefore, upgrading the house envelope  
and services reduces energy consumption by 19.3% and carbon emissions by 13.4%. After adding  
renewables, the total yearly energy consumption increased to 21.4 MWh, and total carbon dioxide  
emissions increased to 9,423.8 kgCO2. Renewables reduce energy consumption by 46% and  
carbon emissions by 49% compared with the baseline. Therefore, adding renewables has a  
greater impact on energy consumption and carbon emissions than upgrading the envelope and  
services does.  
6. Conclusions  
This study suggests a sustainable approach to refurbishing an existing house to achieve near-  
zero emissions. The approach consists of suggesting EPD-certified materials to upgrade the  
house envelope, services and then integrating renewables.  
The total cost of the case study refurbishment is £24,976.9, resulting in a reduction in energy  
consumption and the carbon emissions post-refurbishment to 21.4 MWh and 9423.8 kgCO2  
annually, respectively. Therefore, the total saving from the refurbishment is 40.9 MWh annually in  
energy consumption and 15670.1 kg CO2 in carbon emissions.  
In conclusion, the refurbishment achieved a 65.3% reduction in energy consumption and a 62.4%  
reduction in carbon emissions. This makes the house nearly zero-emission.  
Conflict of Interests  
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.  
Endnotes  
This paper has been presented at the SPACE International Conference 2022 on Sustainable  
Architecture, Planning and Urban Design.  
References  
Adedeji, O., Reuben, O. and Olatoye, O. (2014). Global Climate Change. Journal of Geoscience and  
Environment Protection, 02(02), pp.114–122. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2014.22016  
Alexander Passer, Sébastien Lasvaux, Karen Allacker, Dieter De Lathauwer, Carolin Spirinckx,  
Bastian Wittstock, Daniel Kellenberger, Florian Gschösser, Johannes Wall & Holger Wallbaum  
(2015) Environmental product declarations entering the building sector: critical reflections based  
on 5 to 10 years experience in different European countries The International Journal of Life Cycle  
Assessment volume 20, pages 1199–1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0926-3  
Asadi, E., da Silva, M.G., Antunes, C.H., Dias, L. (2013). State of the Art on Retrofit Strategies Selection  
Using Multi-objective Optimization and Genetic Algorithms. In: Pacheco Torgal, F., Mistretta,  
M., Kaklauskas, A., Granqvist, C., Cabeza, L. (eds) Nearly Zero Energy Building Refurbishment.  
Asam Ahmed, Tianshu Ge, Jinqing Peng, Wei-Cheng Yan, Boon Tuan Tee, Siming You (2022)  
Assessment of the renewable energy generation towards net-zero energy buildings: A review,  
BRE Group. (n.d.). BRE Global. [online] Available at: https://www.bregroup.com/about-us/bre-  
global/ [Accessed 14 Oct. 2020].  
Chan, E. (2014). Building Maintenance Strategy: A Sustainable Refurbishment Perspective.  
Universal Journal of Management 2(1): 19-25. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujm.2014.020103  
Committee on Climate Change. (2017). UK housing: Fit for the future? - Committee on Climate  
[Accessed 14 Oct. 2020].  
Energy efficiency: building towards net zero. (2019). Eighteenth Special Report. House of Commons  
Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee. Online. Available at https://publications.  
Heat network partnership for Scotland (2017) District Heating Strategy Factsheets Application of  
journal.spacestudies.co.uk  
37  
Combined Heat and Power in district heating.  
Herold, A., Cook, V., Baron, Y., Cames, M., Gores, S., Graichen, J., Kasten, P., Mehlhart, G., Siemons,  
A., Urrutia, C., Wolff, F. and Institut, Ö.- (2019). ) EU Environment and Climate Change Policies:  
State of play, current and future challenges, European Parliament. Online. Available at https://  
[Accessed 14 Oct. 2020]  
Home heating guide (2019)Online. Available at https://www.homeheatingguide.co.uk/renewables-  
Jin, Y., Wang, L., Xiong, Y., Cai, H., Li, Y.H. and Zhang, W.J. (2014). Feasibility studies on net-zero  
energy building for climate considering: A case of All Green House” for Datong, Shanxi, China.  
Energy and Buildings, 85, pp.155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.074  
Menassa, C.C., Ortiz-Vega, W. (2013). Uncertainty in Refurbishment Investment. In: Pacheco  
Torgal, F., Mistretta, M., Kaklauskas, A., Granqvist, C., Cabeza, L. (eds) Nearly Zero Energy Building  
Refurbishment. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5523-2_6  
Net Zero Technical report. (2019). Committee on Climate Change May 2019. Online. Available at  
Pacheco Torgal, F. (2013). Introduction. In: Pacheco Torgal, F., Mistretta, M., Kaklauskas, A., Granqvist,  
C., Cabeza, L. (eds) Nearly Zero Energy Building Refurbishment. Springer, London. https://doi.  
Sašo Medved, Suzana Domjan, Ciril Arkar (2019). Sustainable Technologies for nearly Zero Energy  
Buildings Design and Evaluation Methods. Cham Springer International Publishing Springer.  
Zabaneh, G.A. (2011). Zero net house: Preliminary assessment of suitability for Alberta. Renewable  
and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(6), pp.3237–3242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.04.021  
(2019) House of Commons Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee Energy efficiency:  
building towards net-zero Twenty-First Report of Session 2017–19.  
38  
SPACE Studies Publications