ISSN: 2977-814X
ISSUE DOI: https://doi.org/10.51596/sijocp.v3i2 Volume 3 Issue 2
Handan Sabriye Yaman1, Lecturer, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University & PhD Candidate in Arts and Design, Akdeniz University, Turkey, https://orcid.org/ 0000-0001-5793-4048
Received February 20, 2023
Accepted April 3, 2023
Published Online December 29, 2023
https://doi.org/10.51596/sijocp.v3i2.51
Abstract
Eustache Le Sueur, a 17th-century French painter, is celebrated for his contributions to the Baroque movement. His artistry, profoundly influenced by Italian masters like Raphael and Poussin, is epitomised in “The Life of Saint Bruno”, a series detailing the Carthusian founder’s life. Notably, Sueur’s exceptional skill in perspective use is a hallmark of his work. Perspective in art, the technique to create depth and distance illusions on a flat surface, was adeptly wielded by Sueur. He often employed “linear perspective”, a method establishing a vanishing point with diverging lines, thus creating depth perception.
This approach not only imparted a three-dimensional feel but also infused his paintings with dynamism and drama. By varying object size and placement, he enhanced the narrative and emotional intensity of his scenes. Sueur’s mastery of perspective significantly contributes to his enduring legacy. His innovative use of this technique achieved depth and brought vibrancy and energy to his compositions. Today, his influence persists in modern painting, underscoring his pivotal role in the Baroque era and the enduring significance of his perspective techniques.
Keywords: Eustache Le Sueur, painting, perspective, depth
Introduction
In the annals of art history, the name Eustache Le Sueur (1616-1655) holds a distinguished place, especially in the context of 17th-century French painting. Renowned for his religious and mythological themes, Le Sueur’s artistry is a testament to the vibrancy of the Baroque movement and its intricate relationship with the Renaissance influences that permeated Europe. This article delves into the life, works, and enduring legacy of Le Sueur, unravelling the threads of his artistic journey and the profound impact he made on the world of art.
Le Sueur’s journey was unique for his time. While many artists of his era sought inspiration in the artistic havens of Rome, Le Sueur’s path was different. Anchored in Paris and under the tutelage of Simon Vouet, he absorbed the essence of the Baroque style, interweaving it with influences from renowned masters like Raphael and Poussin. His approach to painting was marked by a harmonious blend of classicism and emotional depth, which was further enhanced by his interest in the psychological dimensions of his subjects.
A cornerstone of Le Sueur’s artistic technique was his masterful use of perspective—a tool that he wielded with exceptional skill to create depth and dimensionality on a two-dimensional canvas. The way Le Sueur employed linear perspective, drawing the viewer’s eye into the heart of his
compositions, was not just a technical achievement; it was a narrative device that added drama, emotion, and vitality to his scenes. His works, such as the renowned “Life of Saint Bruno,” stand as eloquent testimonies to his ability to transcend the limitations of the canvas, inviting the viewer into a vividly realised world.
This article aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of his contribution to art through a detailed exploration of Le Sueur’s life, his artistic methodologies, and the broader historical and cultural context of his work. We will explore how his use of perspective shaped his creations and influenced the broader trajectory of art history, inspiring generations of artists who followed in his footsteps. By examining Le Sueur’s work in the light of modern artistic and sociological theories, we aim to offer a renewed perspective on his legacy, underscoring his relevance in contemporary artistic discourse.
As we traverse the life and works of Eustache Le Sueur, we embark on a journey that transcends mere artistic analysis. It is a foray into the heart of a period rich in creative innovation, a period that shaped the course of Western art. Le Sueur’s story is not just a chapter in art history but a narrative of creativity, innovation, and enduring influence.
In the methodological approach of this study, informed by the evolving paradigms of art history and criticism, particularly with respect to the analysis of classical and Baroque art, we primarily rely on an extensive literature review. This review meticulously incorporates a diverse range of scholarly sources, including historical texts, art criticism, contemporary analyses, and academic journals. Particular emphasis is placed on sources that explore the intricacies of 17th-century French painting, the Baroque movement, and the influence of Italian Renaissance artists like Raphael and Poussin. Additionally, this research delves into technical art studies that focus on perspective and its application in Le Sueur’s works. By intertwining these various strands of scholarship, we aim to construct a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of Eustache Le Sueur’s artistic contributions and his unique use of perspective in painting.
Life and Times of Eustache Le Sueur
In the tapestry of 17th-century French art, the life and career of Eustache Le Sueur stand out with remarkable distinction. Born in 1616 in Paris, Le Sueur emerged as a pivotal figure in the Baroque movement, creating a legacy that has resonated through centuries. This section delves into the fascinating journey of Le Sueur’s life, exploring his formative years, artistic evolution, and the influences that shaped his distinctive style. As we traverse the timeline of his life, we uncover not only the story of a prodigious artist but also the cultural and historical currents that defined an era in which Le Sueur played a crucial role. His life, a rich blend of personal creativity and the broader artistic trends of his time offers a window into the vibrant world of 17th-century French art.
Eustache Le Sueur: A 17th-Century French Painter
Eustache Le Sueur was a prominent figure in the context of classical and baroque art. His work exemplified a synthesis of various art forms, as observed in the coordination between music and visual elements in his piece “Ossian” (Andries, 2019). This synthesis was characterised by the fusion of harmony, stage action, machinery, local colour, instrumentation, and melody into a coherent unity where no single genre dominated. Le Sueur’s approach to art was transformative, viewing it as a political praxis or “art as action” (Geyh, 2001). His artistic endeavours reflected a blend of Gothic and Renaissance influences, showcasing his aspiration to incorporate the best of both worlds (Rabin, 2018). Furthermore, his contributions extended to the realm of tragédie lyrique, where he faced hostility during the Terror and the Directory, hindering the performance of his opera at the Académie Royale de Musique (Russo, 1994).
In the context of the influence of the Baroque movement and Italian Renaissance artists such as Raphael and Poussin, along with the subtleties of 17th-century French painting, it is essential to consider the interplay between art and perception. The Baroque movement, characterised by its dramatic use of light and shadow, had a profound impact on the optical techniques employed by artists. For instance, the dark halo technique, as observed in the oeuvre of Michael Sweerts and other Flemish and Dutch baroque painters, served as an empirical solution to mitigate the optical ‘simultaneous contrast’ effect, demonstrating the intricate understanding of visual perception
during this period (Derks et al., 2022). Furthermore, the illusionism in sacred monumental painting of the Baroque era delves into the optics of perception, shedding light on the mechanisms of artistic information processing and the socio-cultural context within the prism of the Counter- Reformation Church (Tkachuk et al., 2021).
The Renaissance period also witnessed the incorporation of subtle symbolism and artistic license in paintings. An intriguing example is the exploration of foot deformities in Renaissance paintings, revealing a mystery of symbolism, artistic license, illusion, and accurate representation in renowned Renaissance painters. This exemplifies the complexities and nuances of artistic expression during this era, where symbolism and illusion played pivotal roles in conveying deeper meanings within the artwork (Lazzeri et al., 2015). Additionally, the physical and chemical characterisation of the pigments used in a 17th-century mural painting in the Spanish Caribbean highlights the technical aspects of art production during this period, providing insights into the materials and techniques employed by artists (Sasso et al., 2021).
Moreover, the influence of Baroque music and dance on artistic expression cannot be overlooked. The tempo in Baroque music and dance significantly impacted the interpretation of visual art, showcasing the interconnectedness of different art forms during this period (Coorevits & Moelants, 2016). This interconnectedness underscores the holistic approach to artistic creation, where music, dance, and visual art converge to create immersive and multisensory experiences for the audience.
Le Sueur’s impact is also evident in his portraiture, as he was recognised as “Eustache Le Sueur peintre de portraits” (Sterling, 1965). Additionally, his work resonated with the aesthetics of the baroque era, drawing analogies with the baroque aesthetic, as seen in L’Illusion comique (Danan, 2021). The concept of interartialité, proposed by Walter, aligns with Le Sueur’s artistic approach and is situated within the continuum of baroque aesthetics (Guay, 2011). Moreover, his influence transcended the boundaries of art, extending to the study of baroque art and its incisive portrayal in various forms, as evidenced in La Parole Baroque (Schmid, 2021).
Eustache Le Sueur, known for his religious and mythological paintings, is 17. he was a century-old French painter. He was part of the Baroque movement and was influenced by Italian artists such as Raphael and Poussin. One of his most famous works is the painting known as the ‘Life of Saint Bruno’, which describes the life of the founder of the Carthusians.
Early Years and Artistic Training
Eustache Le Sueur’s father, a carpenter and sculptor, placed his son Eustache in Simon Vouet’s studio when he was sixteen. Unlike many of his peers, Le Sueur never travelled to Rome; instead, he found his classicising influence in the Baroque style of Vouet. Primarily a painter of religious subjects for the churches in and around Paris, he was said to have little regard for immoral excesses and loved order, simplicity and seclusion. In the 1640s, Le Sueur began studying the works of Nicolas Poussin and may even have known Poussin. Le Sueur became interested in the psychological aspect of his subjects and developed a new classicism of composition and modelling while retaining his characteristic delicate, refined colours and sensitivity. In his last years he immersed himself in the works of Raphael. In 1648, Le Sueur was one of the twelve founding members of the Académie Royale de Peinture et de Sculpture. A talented and prolific painter, he had no direct successor, but his works were famous among later artists. “A single figure by him is a perfect harmony of line and effect, and when many figures are brought together in a single picture, everything is brought into harmony,” wrote Eugène Delacroix (Getty. 2023).
Major Influences and Artistic Style
Le Sueur became interested in the psychological aspect of his subjects and developed a new classicism of composition and modelling while retaining his characteristic delicate, refined colours and sensitivity. In his last years he immersed himself in the works of Raphael. In 1648, Le Sueur was one of the twelve founding members of the Académie Royale de Peinture et de Sculpture. A talented and prolific painter, he had no direct successor, but his works were famous among later artists. ‘A single figure by him is a perfect harmony of line and effect, and when many figures are brought together in a single picture, everything is brought into harmony,’ wrote Eugène Delacroix
(Getty. 2023).
Artistic Techniques and Perspectives in Le Sueur’s Paintings
In Eustache Le Sueur’s artistry, his mastery of technique and innovative use of perspective stand as hallmarks of his genius. This section delves into the intricate artistic methods employed by Le Sueur, shining a light on how he breathed life into two-dimensional canvases with his remarkable perspective skills. We explore the nuances of his colour palette, the finesse of his brushwork, and, most importantly, his adept use of linear perspective to create a compelling illusion of depth. Le Sueur’s paintings are visual representations and intricate narratives crafted through his unique interplay of light, shadow, and perspective. His approach to these elements not only defined his style but also contributed significantly to the evolution of painting techniques in the 17th century.
Perspective Analysis: Creating Depth and Distance in 2D Paintings
One of the most important features of Sueur’s paintings is the use of perspective. Perspective is the technique used by artists to create the illusion of depth and distance in a two-dimensional space. Le Sueur was a master of this technique and used it effectively in his work. He frequently used a technique called “linear perspective”, creating a vanishing point on the line and drawing lines diverging in the distance. This gives the illusion that objects in the image become smaller as they move away from the viewer
Le Sueur’s use of perspective in his paintings is not limited to creating an illusion of depth. He also used his perspective to create movement and energy in his paintings. By manipulating the size and placement of the objects in the painting, he has managed to create a sense of drama and drama.
The technical artworks focusing on perspective and their applications in Le Sueur’s works can be comprehensively understood by examining various aspects. The analysis of 17th-century painted grapes provides insights into the pictorial shortcuts used by painters to imitate the optical phenomenon of specular reflections, shedding light on the techniques employed to convey gloss perception Cicco et al. (2019). Additionally, the dark halo technique, as observed in the oeuvre of Michael Sweerts and other Flemish and Dutch baroque painters, serves as an empirical solution to mitigate the optical ‘simultaneous contrast’ effect, demonstrating the intricate understanding of visual perception during this period (Derks et al., 2022). Furthermore, the physical and chemical characterisation of the pigments used in a 17th-century mural painting in the Spanish Caribbean highlights the technical aspects of art production during this period, providing insights into the materials and techniques employed by artists (Sasso et al., 2021). Moreover, fluctuations in painting production in the 17th-century Netherlands offer a perspective on the innovative exuberance and industry dynamics during that period, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of artistic production and its contextual fluctuations (Li, 2019).
Another definition is perspective; ‘It is the art of measurement and proportion that helps to easily draw and express line, surface and colour changes according to the distance and closeness of objects above or below eye level to the eye. It is divided into two: linear perspective and colour perspective. (Öznülüer, 2019)”
Perspective illusion, that is, a three-dimensional view on the plane; the images on the picture gradually becoming smaller, the colours gradually decreasing, the images that are the basis of the forms becoming unclear as they move from the front plane of the picture to the background plane, size, ordering the images one after another and overflowing, etc. ‘Painting methods can achieve it. The illusion of depth is not a phenomenon seen in the art of all ages. (Turan 2016).
Moreover, computational analysis of equidistant intervals in perspective photographs and paintings has revealed the enduring presence of equidistance in both physical and visual spaces across different historical periods, shedding light on the technical and conceptual continuity in the representation of space and depth in art (Erkelens, 2016). This continuity is exemplified in the meticulous construction of perspective lines and vanishing points in the paintings of Canaletto, underscoring the enduring relevance of perspective in art history and practice (Erkelens, 2020).
As exemplified in mural paintings, the cultural heritage of architectural linear perspective further
emphasises the enduring legacy of perspective in artistic expression. The development of Western quadrature in China highlights the transcultural diffusion of artistic techniques, underscoring the global significance of perspective in shaping visual narratives and spatial representations (Castilla, 2021). This interconnectedness is echoed in the reflection of imagination and perception in medieval painting, where space and scale are imbued with symbolic and perceptual significance, contributing to the rich tapestry of artistic expression and visual communication (Ruta et al., 2022).
Linear Perspective: Le Sueur’s Masterful Technique for Illusion of Depth
With the peak of scientificity in High Renaissance painting, artists began to think differently regarding technique and method. In the face of the idea that the perfection of the works of art had become indisputable, the idea that perfection would not always be interesting began to emerge. It is human nature to be surprised and excited and to gravitate towards the unexpected, the unheard of. (Öznülüer, 2019)
Critical Analysis and Historical Context
The artistic legacy of Eustache Le Sueur transcends mere aesthetic appreciation, warranting a deeper exploration into its critical analysis and historical context. This section contextualised Le Sueur’s work within the broader tapestry of 17th-century French art and the Baroque movement. We scrutinise the reception of his work both in his time and in subsequent art historical discourse, examining how his style interacted with and diverged from the norms of his era. By situating Le Sueur’s oeuvre about his contemporaries and the socio-political currents of his time, we aim to unveil the multifaceted dimensions of his impact on the art world. This critical analysis not only deepens our understanding of Le Sueur’s artistic contributions but also illuminates the intricate interplay between individual creativity and the broader historical narratives of art.
Reception in 17th Century France
Eustache Le Sueur, a prominent 17th-century French painter, is renowned for his religious and mythological paintings, particularly ‘The Life of Saint Bruno,’ which depicts the founder of the Carthusians. His adept use of perspective characterises Le Sueur’s work, a technique crucial for creating the illusion of depth and distance in two-dimensional spaces (Pepperell & Haertel, 2014). His mastery of linear perspective, a method that employs a vanishing point and diverging lines to convey depth, is evident in his paintings, where he skillfully manipulates the size and placement of objects to infuse drama and energy into his compositions (Pepperell & Haertel, 2014).
Comparative Analysis with Contemporaries
Le Sueur’s influence on the Baroque movement is significant, and his use of perspective continues to inspire contemporary artists. His paintings reflect the impact of Italian artists such as Raphael and Poussin, underscoring the interconnectedness of artistic movements across different regions and periods (Sterling, 1965). Furthermore, the use of perspective in Le Sueur’s work goes beyond creating spatial illusions; it also contributes to the overall dynamism and emotional resonance of his paintings, aligning with the broader project of postcolonial sociology (Go, 2013).
The impact of Eustache Le Sueur on perspective analysis in painting is significant, particularly in understanding the manipulation of visual cues to create pictorial depth perception. Le Sueur’s adept use of perspective, particularly linear perspective, allowed him to skillfully manipulate the size and placement of objects in his paintings, creating a sense of movement, drama, and energy. This technique not only gives an illusion of depth but also adds dynamism to his compositions.
Le Sueur’s Impact on French Art History
The significance of perspective in art is further supported by research on the depiction of visual space in artworks. Studies have shown that artists manipulate the central and peripheral visual fields to create a sense of depth and proportion, aligning with the principles of linear perspective employed by Le Sueur (Pepperell & Haertel, 2014). Additionally, the use of vanishing points and the convergence of parallel lines, as observed in Le Sueur’s work, are fundamental aspects of perspectival painting, contributing to the overall viewing experience and the perception of space
within the artwork (Crucq, 2021).
Figure 1. A Dedication of a Carthusian Church (Dédicace d’une église de chartreux), 191x287cm, 1625/1650. Retrieved from https://collections.louvre.fr/en/ark:/53355/cl010066447
Placed in the corners of the small Chartreux monastery in Paris, it is interpreted as the most beautiful of the surviving compositions. If it was made entirely by Le Sueur, it is based on his architectural taste and the effects of perspective, which were treated as carefully as possible [... the interaction of whites and greys, highlighted by crystal light and a few blue and orange notes (the robes of bishops and priests), almost makes me think of contemporary works (Louvre, 2023, Dédicace d’une église de chartreux).
Figure 2. Analysis of the artist’s use of depth and perspective
One of the most important features of Sueur’s paintings is the use of perspective. Perspective is the technique used by artists to create the illusion of depth and distance in a two-dimensional space. Le Sueur was a master of this technique and used it effectively in his work. He frequently used a technique called “linear perspective”, creating a vanishing point on the line and drawing lines diverging in the distance. This gives the illusion that objects in the image become smaller as they move away from the viewer.
Le Sueur’s use of perspective in his paintings is not limited to creating an illusion of depth. He
also used his perspective to create movement and energy in his paintings. By manipulating the size and placement of the objects in the painting, he has managed to create a sense of drama and drama.
Figure 3. Hyante and Climène Offering a Sacrifice to Venus (Hyante et Climène offrant un sacrifice à Vénus), 1600/1625. Retrieved from https://collections.louvre.fr/en/ark:/53355/cl010061015
Eustache Le Sueur made a series of decorations for the hotel built by Jean-Baptiste Lambert de Thorigny Dec. 1641-1644 by Louis Le Vau in Île Saint-Louis in Paris. Le Sueur received its first orders from Jean-Baptiste Lambert. Then, after the manor passed as an inheritance to Jean-Baptiste’s brother Nicolas Lambert de Thorigny, Le Sueur carried out his most important decorations (Louvre, 2023, Vénus présente l’Amour à Jupiter).
Figure 4. Venus Presenting Love to Jupiter (Vénus présente l’Amour à Jupiter), 97x197cm, 1645/1647.
Retrieved from https://collections.louvre.fr/en/ark:/53355/cl010060639
In 1645, he undertook his first significant work, the Cycle of the Life of Saint Bruno, ordering 22 paintings on the saint’s life to decorate the Paris Charterhouse cloister. These works, purchased by Louis, entered the royal collections in 1776. This great commission kept him and several of his assistants busy for three years. With this religious cycle, his style evolves in a harsher direction; the characters in his paintings adopt noble attitudes in scenes with very calculated compositions. The colours become lighter, and the perspective is incredibly detailed. This orientation, inspired
by the classical example of Poussin (who had worked in Paris from 1640 to 1642 before returning to Rome), is found in his later production (Le Sueur E. 2023, Le Retour de Tobie).
Figure 5. Saint Bruno is Taken to Heaven by Angels (Saint Bruno est enlevé au ciel par les anges), 193x130cm, 1645-48. Retrieved from https://collections.louvre.fr/en/ark:/53355/cl010060654
It was part of a series of paintings on the history of Tobie that Gaspard de Fieubet (1577-1647), the financial officer of Savings in Paris, made for the decoration of his hotel. These works must have been done shortly after the completion of the hotel construction site in 1646. Two more paintings from the same cycle are known as decorative: Tobias and Sarah’s Wedding Night and Raphael the Angel Leaving Tobias and his Family. (Fig. 5).
Figure 6. Angel Raphael Reveals His True Nature to Tobit and His Family and Ascends to Heaven (L’ange Raphaël révèle sa véritable nature à Tobie et à sa famille et s’élève au ciel), 1647. Retrieved from https://francearchives.gouv.fr/fr/file/5c35e6cdd67f3cd0c78db4cc2aa91905818612a9/static_8661.jpeg
When we look at the painting called Tobby’s Return (Fig.6), the artist’s perspective has been captured from a different point of view. As in other studies, the perspective point starting from
below eye level enabled the study to be seen as more gigantic. Like Toby’s ascension to heaven (Fig. 5), an imposing story is told from the point of view. (Louvre, 2023, Le Retour de Tobie).
Figure 7. The Return of Tobit (Le Retour de Tobie), 94x167 cm, 1646. Retrieved from https://collections. louvre.fr/en/ark:/53355/cl010062909
Furthermore, the study by (Cook et al., 2008) emphasises the profound influence of visual cues, such as the number of protuberances in a reverse perspective painting, on the illusion of motion in the picture. This underscores the importance of understanding the visual cues contributing to pictorial depth perception, which aligns with the impact of Le Sueur’s manipulation of size and placement in his paintings (Cook et al., 2008).
Conclusion
In conclusion, Eustache Le Sueur’s masterful use of perspective in his paintings not only exemplifies the technical prowess of the Baroque movement but also underscores the enduring impact of perspective on artistic expression and visual communication. His manipulation of spatial elements to evoke emotion and movement resonates with broader sociocultural and historical contexts, reflecting the interconnectedness of artistic traditions and the transcultural diffusion of artistic techniques.
Le Sueur’s approach to perspective was not merely a technical endeavour but a narrative tool that added depth and vitality to his work. By skillfully using linear perspective, he was able to create a sense of three-dimensional space on a two-dimensional canvas, enhancing the viewer’s experience and engagement with the artwork. This technique was pivotal in depicting physical depth and conveying the emotional and spiritual depth of his subjects, particularly in his religious and mythological paintings.
His influence extends beyond the Baroque era, impacting contemporary art and artists. Le Sueur’s innovative use of perspective demonstrates how classical techniques can be adapted to express modern concepts and emotions. His work is a testament to the timelessness of fundamental artistic principles and their adaptability to various eras and styles.
Furthermore, Le Sueur’s contributions to art highlight the importance of perspective in creating a bridge between the artist’s vision and the viewer’s perception. His paintings invite viewers to engage with the scenes he depicts, not just as observers but as participants in a visual narrative. This immersive quality is a hallmark of his style and a significant factor in his enduring legacy.
As a result, Eustache Le Sueur was a master of perspective in painting. His skilful use of perspective gives an illusion of depth and adds depth and energy to his work. As a painter, he continues to influence today’s paintings and is considered an essential part of the Baroque movement, with his use of perspective in his paintings. His legacy endures as a reminder of the transformative power of perspective in art, an element that continues to inspire and challenge artists today.
Conflict of Interests
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Endnotes
This paper has been presented at the SPACE International Conference 2023 on Arts, Design and Architecture.
References
Andries, A. (2019). Uniting the arts to stage the nation: le sueur’s ossian (1804) in Napoleonic Paris. Cambridge Opera Journal, 31(2-3), 153-187. https://doi.org/10.1017/s095458672000004x
Castilla, M. (2021). The cultural heritage of architectural linear perspective: the mural paintings in Nantang church. Heritage, 4(3), 1773-1785. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4030099
Cicco, F., Wijntjes, M., & Pont, S. (2019). Understanding gloss perception through the lens of art: combining perception, image analysis, and painting recipes of 17th century painted grapes. Journal of Vision, 19(3), 7. https://doi.org/10.1167/19.3.7
Coorevits, E. and Moelants, D. (2016). Tempo in baroque music and dance. Music Perception, 33(5), 523-545. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2016.33.5.523
Crucq, A. (2021). Viewing-patterns and perspectival painting: an eye-tracking study on the effect of the vanishing point. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.13.2.15
Danan, J. (2021). Qu’est-ce qu’une approche dramaturgique d’un texte de théâtre ?. Pratiques, (191-192). https://doi.org/10.4000/pratiques.10990
Derks, K., Snickt, G., Legrand, S., Stighelen, K., & Janssens, K. (2022). The dark halo technique in the oeuvre of Michael Sweerts and other Flemish and Dutch baroque painters is a 17th-century empirical solution to mitigate the optical ‘simultaneous contrast’ effect. Heritage Science, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-021-00634-w
Erkelens, C. (2016). Equidistant intervals in perspective photographs and paintings. I-Perception, 7(4), 204166951666266. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516662666
Erkelens, C. (2020). Perspective on canaletto’s paintings of piazza san marco in venice. Art & Perception, 8(1), 49-67. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-20191131
Getty. (2023). Marine Gods Paying Homage to Love. Retrieved: https://www.getty.edu/art/ collection/object/103RCP
Go, J. (2013). Decolonizing Bourdieu. Sociological Theory, 31(1), 49-74. https://doi. org/10.1177/0735275113477082
Geyh, P. (2001). Triptych time: The experimental historiography of Meridel le Sueur’s The Dread Road. Criticism, 43(1), 81-101. https://doi.org/10.1353/crt.2001.0004
Guay, H. (2011). De la polyphonie hétéromorphe à une esthétique de la divergence. L’annuaire Théâtral Revue Québécoise D’études Théâtrales, (47), 15-36. https://doi.org/10.7202/1005613ar
Lazzeri, D., Castello, M., Grassetti, L., Dashti, T., Yx, Z., & Persichetti, P. (2015). Foot deformities in Renaissance paintings. A mystery of symbolism, artistic licence, illusion and true representation in five renowned Renaissance painters. The Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 45(4), 289-297. https://doi.org/10.4997/jrcpe.2015.409
Le Sueur E. (2023). Eustache Le Sueur. Retrieved: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eustache_Le_ Sueur
Li, W. (2019). Innovative exuberance: fluctuations in the painting production in the 17th-century Netherlands. Arts, 8(2), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts8020072
Louvre. (2023). Dédicace d’une église de chartreux. Retrieved: https://collections.louvre.fr/en/ ark:/53355/cl010066447
Louvre. (2023). Le Retour de Tobie. Retrieved: https://collections.louvre.fr/en/ark:/53355/ cl010062909#
Louvre. (2023). Vénus présente l’Amour à Jupiter. Retrieved: https://collections.louvre.fr/en/ ark:/53355/cl010060639
Pepperell, R. and Haertel, M. (2014). Do artists use linear perspective to depict visual space? Perception, 43(5), 395-416. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7692
Rabin, S. (2018). Before Copernicus: The cultures and contexts of scientific learning in the fifteenth century. Rivka Feldhay and F. Jamil Ragep, eds. mcgill-queen’s studies in the history of ideas 71. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-queen’s University Press, 2017.
Renaissance Quarterly, 71(3), 1081-1083. https://doi.org/10.1086/700459
Russo, P. (1994). Visions of Medea: music-dramatic transformations of a myth. Cambridge Opera Journal, 6(2), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954586700004201
Ruta, N., Burleigh, A., & Pepperell, R. (2022). Space and scale in medieval painting reflects imagination and perception. Gestalt Theory, 44(1-2), 61-78. https://doi.org/10.2478/gth-2022-0006
Sasso, V., Pérez, G., Valero, L., Martínez-Ramírez, S., Guerrero, A., & Vicioso, E. (2021). Physical and chemical characterisation of the pigments of a 17th-century mural painting in the Spanish Caribbean. Materials, 14(22), 6866. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14226866
Schmid, M. (2021). Baroque visions: eugène green’s la sapienza (2014). The Modern Language Review, 116(3), 428-444. https://doi.org/10.1353/mlr.2021.0066
Sterling, C. (1965). Eustache le sueur peintre de portraits., 181-184. https://doi. org/10.1515/9783112414606-018
Tkachuk, I., Lysun, Y., Hrynda, B., Shymin, Y., & Yankovska, D. (2021). Illusionism in sacred monumental painting of the baroque era, optics of perception. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S4), 1270-1287. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5ns4.1777
Turan S. (2016). Double Escape Point Perspective. Uludag University Faculty of Education Pedagogical Formation Education Program Painting-Business Education Department Lesson Plan, Bursa.
Öznülüer, H. (2019). From the High Renaissance to the Modern Period, the Position of the Figure in Space, Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences of Erzincan University, Year 12, Issue 1, pp. 160-176.